Sponsored by

Same job, but make it masculine

Happy Hump Day {{first_name | Toaster}} 🐪 ,

Funny how a job gets more important when it sounds technical, right? Marketing job titles are being rebranded to ‘Narrative Engineer’ or ‘Go-to-Market Engineer’. Same work, but suddenly it sounds harder and more technical.

Miranda Does Brands explores this in a recent TikTok that you can watch here. She argues that marketing roles aren’t changing that much, but the language surrounding the roles is. Miranda discusses how entire fields have flipped gender dynamics based on perceived value. When certain work is seen as valuable, we don’t just pay it more, we reframe it to sound more ‘masculine’.

She uses the example of programming, which was originally considered clerical work and largely done by women. It was seen as “soft” compared to men building hardware. When software became valuable (1980s PC boom), programming was rebranded as “software engineering”. This shift elevated status and gradually pushed women out of the field.

We’ve seen this across many other industries as well:

  • From HR to people ops / talent strategy. What used to be seen as administrative is now positioned as strategic, data-driven, tied to performance and revenue.

  • From domestic cooking to professional chef. Cooking at home is expected, unpaid, and feminized labour. Cooking as a career in a high-end restaurant is prestigious and recognition-worthy - and hence disproportionately male at the top.

  • From teaching to academia / educational leadership. Early education (mostly women) is underpaid and undervalued. Meanwhile, professors, deans, and policy leaders (mostly men) hold status, influence, and higher compensation.

We even see this within marketing itself. Women tend to be overrepresented in more creative, brand, and content-focused roles, often associated with being “right-brained.” Meanwhile, roles like “product marketing manager” (61.6% of PMM’s in the US are men) skew more male and are framed as strategic, analytical, and revenue-driven. Same discipline, but one side is seen as creative support, the other as business-critical.

At Toast, we are also looking to change perception by helping more women step into roles that have historically been male-dominated. We talk about skills differently, rewrite job descriptions, and remove biased signals through blind recruitment and more neutral candidate profiles. So you could argue: Aren’t we doing the same thing? Reframing roles. Changing language. Shifting who applies?

Here’s where we see the distinction: there’s a difference between expanding access and reinforcing gatekeeping. What we’re seeing in some of these “engineer-ification” trends is adding jargon, increasing perceived barriers, and signalling exclusivity. It raises the ceiling but often narrows the doorway. What we’re trying to do is the opposite - strip away unnecessary language, focus on transferable skills, and make the doorway wider without lowering the bar.

Titles don’t just describe work, they shape who feels qualified to do it. So maybe the question isn’t: “Should we change how roles are positioned?” It’s: “Who benefits when we do? and who gets quietly filtered out?” It’s not about feminizing or masculinizing work, we want to ensure that when the value of work changes the people who’ve already been doing it don’t get left behind.



Team Toast 🥂

Open Roles 🥖

We have a cornucopia of open roles in tech just waiting for you to apply. Resume isn't up to snuff? Don't worry - we don't use resumes! Simply submit what you have. Or jump into our talent pool for general consideration 🤿

New roles this week

Upcoming Events 🗓️

Wednesday, April 22nd @ 12:00pm MST / 2:00pm EST

💻 Zoom

Thursday, April 23rd @ 5:00pm PST

📍Register to see address

Saturday, April 25th @ 11:00am MST

📍Register to see address

Sunday, April 26th @ 1:00pm EST

📍Register to see address

 

Community Partner 🤝

Finally, Skincare That Boosts NAD+ At the Source

For decades, skincare has focused on aesthetic results. But we started by asking a different question: what if instead of trying to preserve our skin's youth, we prioritized optimizing our skin's function? That's how Aramore’s  NAD+ skincare was born.

Developed by Harvard & MIT scientists, Aramore is a skincare system based on skin’s performance, not just its appearance. NAD+ production slows down significantly as we age, and this causes all the telltale science of aging. 

Aramore is the only skincare formulated to help skin produce NAD+ like much younger skin would. The result? Skin that’s stronger, firmer,  and more resilient, that not only looks better, but stays healthier over time.

Team Toast

Keep Reading